It is a scientifically sound statement to say that we live in a four dimensional world. What we can perceive based on our limited set of senses is the three dimensions of space: Up/Down, Left/Right, Forward and Back, as well as the added dimension of Time. Why then are we ruled by a political perspective which is decidedly two dimensional? Left and Right. Life is infinitely more complex than a rope spanning two schools of thought. But a funny thing happens when you look at that rope outside of the “safe” perspective. You realize it is only one dimension. Just as you would when transferring your view of a taut rope from a full profile, to having your eye to the line, staring down it length-wise. The illusion of duality disappears.

Once you have gained a perspective outside the Progressive one dimensional line, we’re being ushered down, the lie becomes clear and the obligation to shake others from their erroneous perch becomes paramount. Though this is no easy task. Most people would rather cling to the “Party Line” for dear life, than venture into active and unfamiliar sea of knowledge. In this sea you must wade through dirty waters and pure. Filtering out the good from the bad to survive. Treading water takes more effort than shuffling down a line. Some sink, and some swim. But the view is grand and the freedom to swim is empowering.

Along the rope they have a sense of familiarity and purpose. They walk their respective side of the line, locking step with others around them to ensure a steady footing. They keep their eyes on their feet, all while cursing those one the opposing side the rope for rocking the line and unsettling their step. The only thing we swimmers can do is splash our somnambulant brothers and sisters, coaxing them to awake and dive on in.

Metaphors aside… this is the essence of the Trans-Partisan Perspective. Realizing our paradigm has been seeded with error and finding solutions in the tried-&-true foundation of natural god-given rights, so eloquently expounded in this countries founding documents. To follow the two sided party line is to be controlled and exploited.

This philosophy is also know by another name, “Political Atheism”, often used by the Trends Research Institute’s master of perspective, Gerald Celente. This is characterized as not believing in the existence of a two party system. Though atheism implies belief and faith, and to most of the waking public it is no longer an issue of belief. The reality of the progressive agenda, which has long ago hijacked the two party system and melded it into one, is as obvious as the four dimensions we perceive every day.

That is why I prefer the term Trans-Partisan. It embodies the idea that you are looking at the bi-partisan culture from a perspective which nullifies the illusion of duality. Either it appears to be two parties or it is only one, which way do you choose to see it?

You could say that the two parties, Democrat and Republican, are two flavors of the same toxic drink. They have been specially formulated to appeal to the widest variety of tastes, but when you start drinking one the other is almost undrinkable. Lets briefly examine the different flavors of the kool-aid, then try to cut to the heart of Who is concocting this toxic brew. Though without focusing on the formula itself (the individual views) I will simply point out the poison present in each flavor. Each poison is derived from something natural, something which is a legitimate issue, but has been deliberately skewed to serve the false reality of the Progressive party line.

Left – Democrat

The left is the most openly “Progressive” side of the coin. The nexus of their doctrine is environmentalism. Based on the organically manifested concerns of our effect on the planet (pun intended) but wildly exaggerated to create a climate of fear. Of course what I am referring to is Global Warming. Like Alinsky’s 9th tactic, the threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. What this issue has done is turned a population of “do gooders” into “useful idiots”. They believe they are doing the right thing, based on self preservation and sometimes even pure altruism, but in reality they are playing into a greater scheme to destroy national sovereignty and allowing their individual liberties to be limited. What is the endgame here? That would be global government run by the largely unelected Progressive movement, and the transfer of wealth from the poor and middle class to the multi-national elites.

Recently however there has been a major blow to their program. Climategate blew their cover wide open and exposed (to those willing to look) the pounding heart of the corrupt elite class. Don’t expect this to stop them though. The globalist lynchpin of Carbon Tax and Cap and Trade has been resurrected as a result of the peculiar yet tragic events in the Gulf of Mexico.

Right – Republican

The GOP is a harder nut to crack. I actually don’t prefer to even use the term GOP (Grand Old Party) because it legitimizes the acceptable use of the word “Progressive”. Playing Old off of New, Stodgy Ideas vs. Fresh. When again, they are one in the same. But I digress… The progressive conservatives can in some cases be called “Neo-Cons”. They are the reinvention of the original idea of a republic, twisted for that “New World” flavor.

The poison of choice for the right is the War on Terror. Again this is a hot-button issue which has a significant basis in reality. It is a sad reality that terrorism does in deed exist. It is a tactic that is often instituted by radical Islam. However, this tactic has been used throughout history by all cultures on enemies foreign and domestic. It is not exclusive to radical Islam. The tangible existence of terrorism makes the war in its name a double edge sword which can cut the ones who wield it. If you allow restrictive measures to battle the threat of external terrorism, those same measures can be applied to anybody labeled a terrorist. It is a war of semantics, where the mere invocation of the word can distance most people from inspecting legitimate and logic viewpoints further (much like the effect of the word “Conspiracy Theory”). Unfortunately, it happens this tactic is already being used domestically as seen in the infamous MIAC Reports. The “T” word has been openly applied to the Tea Party, 9-11 Truth Activists, Ron Paul supporters, Gun Rights supporters, and even those who cite the Constitution. As we can see this is a dangerous road to follow. It can and will result in a vicious backfire on natural and healthy political descent.

The other and more veiled side of this razor serrated blade is the Islam distraction. There are without a doubt fundamentally extreme Muslims who want nothing more than to take out as many infidels as possible. The bloody religious crusade is a battle that nearly every religion has adopted at some point in it existence. However, our actions as occupiers of Iraq, Afghanistan, and even Pakistan (whether you feel it’s justified or not) creates real world opposition. This opposition I would not consider “Terrorists” as compared to the previously mentioned faction. The saying “Hurt people, hurt people” comes to mind. When a population is invaded and civilian casualty rates are enormously high we can only expect an equal and opposite reaction. That is to say, revenge. This creates an endless cycle of conflict. What the answer is to this… I don’t know? But perspective outside the axiom of “Muslim terrorists are trying to take over the world” is important when searching for solutions.

The ends to which these two facets of the War on Terror serves is to restrict the individual liberties of citizens, allowing elitist exploitation to continue unfettered. It also keeps people’s attention fixed on an outside threat, no matter how real, contrived, provocateured, or manufactured it is. As long as terrorized citizens don’t recognize the threat within the system there is no hope but to capitulate to the pressures being hoisted upon them.

The Big Picture

This whole system results in the consistent waddling of a bloated beast into our once free and glorious country. One party is voted in and makes a step towards taking greater control. Then when the public screams for change the next foot of the beast is allowed to step into office. The steps it takes with its two feet may not be big, but the consistently encroaching steps keep us backing up on our stances little bit by little bit, until it has pushed us out completely. This is something we can no longer afford to do.

So what is this progressing beast, and how does it control two seemingly opposing institutions? For the sake of keeping this a relatively short read I will merely point in a direction and ask you, the reader, to research for yourself. On this matter, I don’t expect my word to be trusted over the next man’s (or woman’s). But if you can dip your toe in that sea of information it might just entice you enough to go for a swim.

As Baron Mayer Amschel Rothschild stated “Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes the laws.”. The whole of the controlling elites comes down to our money masters. Namely the Federal Reserve and it’s constituent international banks like the Bank of England, The IMF, the BIS. Not to mention it’s minion entities in Wall Street and the top national banks. Just search these and the following terms, view the following links and make of it what you will. But keep this in mind. When institutions are given free reign to create an endless supply of money they no longer play by the same set of rules as everybody else. George Washington put it best when he said “Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder.”. That bidder is the banks and the men of little virtue is our politicians, whom are paid to put tension on the party line, regardless of which side they’re on.

Research:

Web Sites
Global Research Institute
August Review

Search Terms
Bilderberg
Council on Foreign Relations
Club of Rome
Trilateral Commission
Agenda 21
Income Tax “Show me the law”

Books
The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin
End The Fed by Ron Paul

Documentaries
The Money Masters
The Obama Deception
America: Freedom to Fascism
Money as Debt
Century of the Self